Nature and Sexuality

Feminists tend to complain that sexuality objectifies women.
I say: WRONG! Sexuality does NOT objectifies women. Feminism, especially the extremist branch of it, objectifies women, not sex. Here is why.

Nature is sexual. Anything that is alive will be of a sexual nature, anywhere from plants and bugs to humans. Whether plants or bugs have sex, it does not matter, they are sexual beings. You have male plants, and female plants. Both sexes need to be present for reproduction. If there is no reproduction, there is not survival of the specie, but death. So, from this perspective, good news, feminists are a dying race, at least the extremists, anti-porn and anti-sex feminists.

Some species of plants and invertebrates are asexual. One individual is both male and female, but this is a minority. In over 90 % of the cases, both genders are necessary to survival of a specie. In the plant Kingdom, bees, other insects, bugs and wind are responsible for the pollination of the female plant by the pollen of the male plant. So let's say that in this case, pollen is the equivalent of sperm in the plant kingdom. OK, there may or may not be any physical contact between the plants, after all they are just that, plants! Nevertheless, reproduction occurs through some form of sexual reproduction! That is the WAY nature works! Like it or not, it is sex basics !

With animals, physical contact is of course necessary for reproduction. Now don't give me this big shit about science and in vitro and so forth. It is not real reproduction, it is only a band aid solution to some infertility problems and only available to people with lots of money. This does NOT count. Real animal and human reproduction is still done and will always be done through sex. There is no better way to reproduce than through sex!!!!! GEEEEEEZE even animals got that message!!!!! Having No sex, you're genes will die. It is that simple. Sex is the most natural animal and human behavior on the surface of this planet. If you are alive, you need sex to survive, not only from a reproductive view, but also to live a happy live! In this case we can use the example of science, science has many times proven that a healthy sex life makes people healthier and happier. Why? Nature has seen to this so that sex can be an attractive thing, something enjoyable. During sex, different hormones are released, and these hormones will make someone feel good and happy. You're depressed? Try some sex. Have a headache? Try some sex. Of course men and women release different hormones, and mixed together, their impact is even better. Now, I haven't read much on this so I can't tell for sure, but I would not be surprised. After all, men and women are supposed to be complementary.

So, if a feminist tells you that sexuality objectifies a woman, she is fucked up in the head. Sexuality only occurs with live things. Inanimate objects do NOT have sex. Therefore, sexuality does not objectify a woman, because it is natural to live things. On the other hand, feminism DOES objectify women, because they want you to be an inanimate puppet! Remember, only objects have no sexuality. Therefore, contrarily to what some feminists make you believe, the sexual desire of men for women or even porn does not objectify a woman, feminism on the other hand, does.

Furthermore, I am not saying that women should behave as prostitutes and sleep around, because some other feminist views do promote total sluts. What i am saying is that neither extreme is healthy or good. What I am saying, is that sex is a good thing with a stable partner.

Death to feminism

I haven't been around lately. After all, i have a husband and a home to take care off, and a baby on the way. And unfortunately, blogging and just even keeping updated about all what is going on the blogs is time consuming. But nevertheless important for the anti feminist movement.
Yes I hate feminists, i despise them, i want them out of our society. Until recently, i wouldn't care less of there existence as long as they would leave people alone. After all, even though they are a bunch of fucking stupid bitches, they are human beings. So my main concern was to get rid of them, not necessarily by eradicating them, but simply by somehow taking their power they have over our societies away. I am a supporter of the MRA/MRM not because i wish men to have supremacy over women in society or anything like this. No. I support them because it is the right thing to do. Because our society is fucked up. Because we need balance. A rich world is made of all kind of people having all kind of beliefs. And I believe that no one is superior to any one else in particular. I am one of those who supports justice, not injustice. And therefore, as long as society is somewhat balanced, I wouldn't care less of the existence of those so called feminists as long as they keep their stupid and ridiculous beliefs to themselves. Unfortunately they don't. They try to impose them on everyone else, and it is WRONG.

But lately, something really interesting happened. And this made me realize that just taking power away from feminists is not enough. They definitively need to be eradicated. I am not saying to kill them, but to eradicate their philosophies and not allowing them to be "feminists". I suppose it is wrong because in some ways, as conscientious beings, we disagree with the extermination of individuals simply because of their religious beliefs or race or for any of their believes.

But now, i am fully realizing that just despising feminism and speaking against it is not enough anymore. Feminism is not innocent. Feminism is not just a philosophy, a system of social beliefs anymore. It is true that among MRA's and anti-feminists, feminism is often compared to nazism, and for good reason. Being a a nazi, or neo-nazi is taboo, and again for good reason. Even though freedom of speech is an important component of our society, it does not mean that hatred movements should be allowed a voice, therefore, feminism should be completely destroyed. By saying that feminism should be destroyed, I am not saying that women should loose their rights, or should be treated as nothing less but animals. No, what i am saying is that men should reacquire the rights that they deserve. Men, because they are humans, should be treated as humans. Because we are all humans we should have the same rights. We should not have rights because we are either male or female, but because we are HUMANS!

Feminists do not treat anyone like a human. In their eyes, neither men, neither women are humans. To them we are all salves. In their eyes, the only ones having rights are only those who support them and are among their ranks.

And poor Emma, the one who incited me to write this, you are full of shit. You though you made fun of us. Perhaps. Perhaps not. Personally I believe you failed in your endeavor. You are boasting that many of us bought into your crap. Well we did not all buy into your crap, some of us were suspicious. And for good cause. You think you marked a point. But no, Hey, as women, we know how you bitches are, we know how deceiving some women out there can be. We are not stupid. You are the gullible one, not us, and not the MRA's. By doing what you did, you simply strengthened the ties of the MRA's and anti-feminists and of course of use anti-feminist women ( yes we are not all fake, despite the fact you tried to discredit us). You do not realize it, but you gave us weapons against you and your likes.

Also, your behaviour just makes us despise your kind even more. When we really start striking at you, none of us will have any pity or sympathy whatsoever, we will all be completely indiscriminate against all your kind. To me, feminists are no more humans, they are just a bunch of biological garbage that needs to be cleaned up from this planet.
Therefore, go fuck yourself, you fucking lazy bitch and die soon form you std's .

DEATH TO FEMINISM

Femhag laziness puts their children at risk

Eating hot dogs and other types of processed meats, increases the risks of cancer. The first time I read an article discussing the subject, it only mentioned hot dogs and the increase risks of brain cancer in children eating over a certain quantity of hot dogs within a certain amount of time, over the course of time. So I just went to investigate the problem a little further and just discovered, that not only hot dogs, but most processed meats, including deli meats, were increasing the risks of cancer, not only brain cancer in children, but almost any type of cancer ( a few examples are prostate cancer, brain cancer, pancreatic cancer, colon cancer, etc, just to name a few that have been studied so far) in just about anyone! If you need to investigate this further by yourself, just google "hot dog and cancer" or something like that.

So here are a few links:

Hot Dogs May Cause Genetic Mutations

VITAMINS COUNTERACT NEGATIVE EFFECTS:
CANCER RISKS LURK IN HOT DOGS AND BURGERS
This site is not too good, although it gives some interesting numbers which may or may not mean much. The one thing that I find ridiculous, is why on earth would you waste your money on vitamins!? For crying out loud, a good well balanced nutrition will provide someone with all the vitamins and nutrients it needs! Why feed kids crap, and then counteract it with pills??? It is just another rip off from pharmaceutical companies selling you crap you don't need. Feed your kids a healthy diet and they won't need any extra crappy vitamins!!!! Which are synthetic anyway! and for of the vitamins that body needs to produce, just send them out in the frech air to play, instead of letting the TV babysit them...

News Net Nebraska- Some hot dogs may hike cancer risk
Yeah hot dogs, not sausages. If you really want a nice sausage sandwich, just pay a couple more bucks for some real good sausages that you can cook on an open fire or BBQ... hmmm... soooo much better and tastier than a fucking hot dog!


Partial Purification from Hot Dogs of N-Nitroso Compound Precursors and Their Mutagenicity after Nitrosation
and lastly, what seems to be an official paper about hot dogs and cancer....


So, as a proof that this is not a lie, I have a question for you. Has anyone ever seen a raccoon eat a hot dog????????? I mean those guys will eat anything, they eat garbage for Christ sake!!!! but has anyone seen them eating a hot dog????? if you "google" google for an image of a raccoon, or a raccoon eating hot dog, you won't find it. You may find a raccoon orgy or a raccoon fucking a dog, but not a raccoon eating a hot dog.

I mean, if a garbage eater, scavenger refuses to eat a hot dog, there must be a fucking serious problem with these hot dogs.... A scavenger refusing to eat that crap!!!!! and femhags, cause they are too fucking busy to cook, will either feed their kids that crap, or worse, bring them too fast food!!!! Come on, wake up, we are talking about poison here!!!!poisoning your kids!



Obviously this is not a real picture, since no picture of a raccoon eating a hot dog could be found. On the other hand, here is a funny story that happened to us, personally, a couple summers ago on a camping trip. My husband and I, went on camping trip for a week-end with a bunch of people. The camp site was about 3-4 hours walk from civilization, in the middle of the woods with no human soul for many kilometers. So the first evening we were there, after dinner, some people did not seemed to be willing to pack the food away, kind of like, "this belongs to no one" type of thing, because some people just had too much too drink or had no idea what real wild camping in company of wolves, coyotes and bears was like. So we just took upon ourselves to clean up and pack whatever was left out by a few people with our own stuff. Unfortunately the bag was pretty full and heavy. We did manage to put it in a tree on a fairly high branch. Unfortunately it was to close to the trunk, it was too heavy, we couldn't bring it far away form the trunk, and got not much help, since some people were way out there. SO we did the best with what we had and took a chance. We thought, "well if something happens, it will happen and it will give a good lesson to some people".

Obviously something did happen! The bag was full of food, too close to the tree trunk, but too high for a bear or a wolf to get at. But just perfect for a raccoon!!!!!
Oh yeah. The raccoon was probably sooo happy. Unfortunately for him, he really did not appreciate some of the food we gathered from other people. The zipper on the bag was broken, a couple teeth marks, two bags of trail mix sitting on top of everything were eaten. The pack of hot-dogs was open, with a hot dog or two missing, and the rest of the food intact!!!!!!!!
Actually, we found a hot dog on the ground at the foot of the tree with a couple bites missing !!! The poor thing did not eat the hot dog! and not only did it not eat the hot dog, it did not even dared to go back for more real goodies in there!!!!! We couldn't believe it. We barely lost any food whatsoever except for that pack of hot dogs that did not even belonged to us!!!!!!!!!
So morality of the story? Hot dogs are really bad for you, especially since raccoons won't eat them. I ma sure that one wasn't happy for too long after the discovery of the infamous packof hot dogs....If you ever go on a camping trip, bring a pack of those hot dogs with you, hoping that if something gets into your food, it will get into them first and leave the rest of your food intact.

So yeah, this is a REAL story, not a joke, and it tells a lot about commercial hot dogs, and perhaps not just hot dogs, but any processed food out there!!!
Therefore, femhags should get off their asses and learn how to cook for their families, if they want to have healthy families, vitamins and drugs are NOT the solution!!!!! At least for those who already have families, cause with the way things are going these days with feminazis.... lots of them will be familyless and childless pretty soon, if it is not already the case.....

An MRA yahoo group

Ok, so I thought it may make a nice statement for a woman to start an anti feminist group dedicated to men's rights and actual equality.
This e-mailing group has just been created and membership is easily done by any of the bloggers for the next two weeks. After that, if there is interest in the group, new memberships will have to be approved by the members before I can let them join, in order to avoid trolls and feminazis to join but also for all of us to be secure and being able to freely discuss all kinds of issues related to anti-feminism. The only exception, would be for the bloggers whom, after debating the subject of joining for to long, and missed the two week deadline, I'll simply approve them without going through the process of the members accepting them. If you have better ideas on how to treat new memberships, please go ahead and propose them.

I thought it would be a good idea to create such a group because it seems the MRA movement is growing. Perhaps, from this group, people will decide to create local groups, find people in their area and make us be heard. Perhaps I sound extremely optimistic about this. but nothing will be achieved if we don't keep working. All of this may take time to be achieved and to happen but in order for it to happen, we need to start with this somewhere, and why not now? Blogs are great, amazing, and hopefully this group will simply be a parallel thing to the blogs. The blogs being public, telling the whole world what we believe and the group would be used to safely start a social network among yourselves, ourselves. Starting, I suppose a community.

No censorship may be applied other than respecting each other despite the many disagreements that may rise in order so that we can all learn from each other.

So this is the MRA yahoo group, perhaps not the best option, but an easy one, just click here.

Hopefully many of you will join.

How women and men are caught into either perpetual pauverty or slavery by the Feminazi State

These are my own conclusions form life experience and extensive social observations.
It is not a scientific study since the feminised states would never allow such a study to be done.

So, despite the fact that this is primarily based on my own observations, it does not make it less true. Just stop for a moment and think about it, you most likely will understand what I am saying.

Young girls, unless lucky enough to be born into a wealthy family which can afford to send her to university or college, only has to choices available to her:

1- Perpetual poverty
2- Perpetual slavery for the feminized State

So lets get deeper into this. Why perpetual poverty? Well if a young girl decides that she wants to have a family, she can't afford to go get a post-secondary education, unless she lives in semi-socialist state such as France or Quebec for example, where education is relatively cheap compared to English speaking States ( from my own experience, English Canada or the US, perhaps England??? I am not sure how it works in England, so if anyone has any information is welcomed to post it ).

So if the girl decides to find a husband and marry, she is completely dependent on the husband. But as long, as the couple in question is fine with that, there is no issue. The issues arise, when the girl in question can't get a husband. My goal is not to investigate the reasons of being single, so those reasons do not matter here. The only thing that matters is that she is by herself. With no education, the good job opportunities are rare, perhaps nonexistent for her. Minimum wage jobs, can't even pay a month's rent. SO if she can't even afford rent , how can she live? perhaps by sharing a place with some people, but adding bills and food and clothing, even if it is the bare minimum, are still pretty pricey. That girl or girls, are going to live in poverty perhaps for their entire lives. This scenario is also valid for a young man with no education. So say that two of those young people meet, and decide to live together and have a family, they can't afford much. They will still live in poverty. Raising a family in poverty. The girl has to work as well, both parents have to work long hours, the children being alone are to fend for themselves. Those children will grow up, and face the same issues as their parents. And the vicious circle of poverty is starting again.
At least, those two people have each other, for love and moral support, but how about those whom can't find a companion? Their future is even more dark. .. loneliness, perhaps addictions, etc. And this is how the perpetual poverty goes on... and it does not only affect women, bot both genders.

Secondly, let's say that the girl, decides to get an education. Perhaps, if she chooses to go to college MAYBE, but only maybe will she only be lucky enough to keep her student debts low enough, that she will not have to be a slave forever to feminism. If that is the case, once her debts are paid off, she can choose to keep working, to start a family, stay at home to raise that family or simply work part time. She has more choices. She may be able to decide. But even in her case, she is stuck into that slavery until she's paid her debts. She can't afford to settle quickly after college, she has to pay her dues to the matriarchal state. A husband alone can't provide for the family and at the same time pay for the students for both of them.

A girl going to university, is a slave forever. She has debts to pay until her death. No matter how careful she was with her loans or whether she had part time jobs or not. Sure, the one who worked may have an easier load, but nevertheless a load. That woman, even if she settles young and has a family, she will have to work perhaps for her whole life. She can't enjoy parenthood as much as she would like to. And again, even if she may be lucky enough to manage paying her debts in a few years, and has the choice of staying home or working, either full or part time, she will nevertheless be a slave to the feminazi state forever. Why? because women who went to college or university, even though they may be lucky enough to settle and raise families at home, their husbands may only be able to provide enough for the family to live, but not enough to send those kids for a post-secondary education.

Those children will therefore have to make the same decisions as their mothers and fathers before them, either to live in perpetual poverty or being slave to the sate.
Unless both parents work, with high enough incomes for their whole lives, that circle will never be broken. Especially when our society emphasis the fact that if a child does not go to university, is a looser, things will only get worse and worse. Because those kids are all gonna want to go to university, there will be more people with debts and less jobs for all of them. With too much competition fro jobs, the wages will go down, for those who manage to get those jobs, and those ones forced to take jobs that pay even less, are not only caught in slavery but poverty.

Actually, the situation for the poor people is even worse, because not only are they poor, but they are no less slaves for the matriarchal state and it's nasty corporations.
So in the end, only the rich benefit from the matriarchal state. Middle class and lower class are worth nothing to the government. They are just forced labour, and they don't even know it.

|And all of this to say that education, is not and acquired right yet, for no one, unless you are willing to pay a huge price for it with your own life. So people, welcome to modern forced labour! Freedom? Liberty? What's that? Never heard of it, it does not exist around here.
Feminism affects negatively all of us! Speak up against it!

Girls gone wild

Women, especially the young women and girls out there, have no respect for their bodies anymore. As matter of fact they don't have ANY respect for anything. I believe they either forgot what the meaning of respect means or, no one ever taught them what respect means.

What's even more interesting is that by allowing such things to happen on their campuses, colleges and universities, are nothing more than institutionalized places of debauchery.
Warning: parents, keep an eye on your daughters, no matter what age they are.

Here is an interesting article at this website here
or here is the whole article:

Girls Gone Wild - Feminists Launch V-Week Smut Fest
Feature Article by: Nick Kavanagh on February 25th, 2005 at 1:08 PM
Thank Feminism for Dirty Girls.

There comes a time in every journalist’s career when he is confronted with a story of such amazing significance that it provides the opportunity for the writer to really reach out and touch his readers’ hearts. Such stories bring a journalist true satisfaction. Unfortunately, this is not one of those instances: I’m stuck covering The Vagina Monologues.

To tell you the truth, I don’t even know why I’m wasting the ink to write about this awful event. After all, chocolate vaginas and sex toys don’t really fit into my motif as a writer. However, there is just something about a bunch of talking vaginas that is too offensive to ignore. So for those of you lucky enough to have missed the Cornell Women’s Resource Center’s staging of Eve Ensler’s depraved play The Vagina Monologues, I feel like I should issue a warning. What’s about to follow is pretty offensive.

On February 17 and 18, a number of Cornell students performed a staged reading of skits from feminist Eve Ensler’s outrageously irreverent play The Vagina Monologues. This performance marked the climax (pun intended) of this year’s V-Week celebration, which included such Ivy League activities as pin the clitoris on the vagina and a full-blown sex toy party. The stated purpose of Ensler’s skits is to “empower” women and to raise awareness on issues like rape and domestic violence.

However, before all of Cornell’s female students jump on the bandwagon, start grabbing their crotches, and screaming “girl power,” I’d like someone to explain to me exactly what a series of monologues about menstruation and pubic hair does to further the cause of women’s rights. After all, I would think a vulgar display like this would be disparaging to women. Yet, like all the other garbage the modern feminist movement shovels, somehow someone always buys into it.

Just to give you an idea of the kind of nonsense modern feminists have been peddling, I picked out some highlights from over the last few years. I think these instances speak for themselves.

Take this gem for example. In her ridiculous book The Frailty Myth, feminist author and activist Colette Dowling argues that women are just as athletically capable as men are and asserts the only reason they do not excel equally in sports is because society has conditioned women to believe they are weak. According to Ms. Dowling, if women were not indoctrinated like this they would dominate the NFL, NBA, and MLB leagues.

Here is one from just a few months ago. In trying to explain the disproportionate success of men in the fields of math and science, Harvard President Lawrence Summers suggested that such a gap might be caused by innate gender differences. The feminist response to this suggestion was not reasoned argument, but a reactionary uproar and a series of painful arm-twistings that eventually coerced President Summers into apologizing for his comments.

Or let’s take this delusional piece. In the February 13 edition of the Los Angeles Times, Caryl Rivers and Rosalind Barrett authored an article which insisted men don’t necessarily prefer young beautiful women to successful women. According to these feminist scholars, a man would rather come home to a woman with a high intellect than one that resembled Jennifer Love-Hewitt.

I don’t think any fair-minded person would agree with any of the nonsense these modern feminists are propagating. But what compels them to say such crazy things? The answer is a lot more complex than you might think.

The driving force behind much of the modern feminist movement is the logic that since guys have been acting like savages for thousands of years, to be truly equal women have to join in on the fun. After all, why should men be free to hump everything in sight while women are forced to sit passively on the sidelines?

This is exactly the kind of failed logic that has engendered so many of America’s current problems. Historically, women have acted as the main civilizing force of men. By nature, women were the ones who were supposed to bring restraint to the relationship. However, when women started to feel the only way they can be free was by acting as morally depraved as men do, there was no more civilizing force and the whole system collapsed. The results of this collapse include such inimical social ills as the skyrocketing illegitimacy rate, the destruction of the family, and the killing of millions of children through licensed abortion.

What most women need to learn is that the road to equality is not paved with dildos and edible underwear, but with the self-respect to say no. Women can’t achieve equality by going out on weekends and whoring it up with a bunch of beer-soaked frat boys. That’s just giving in to what men want. If women really want to wield some power, they should try not giving it up so easily.

Now don’t get me wrong, I understand and sympathize with the reasons for the V-week celebration. Trying to stop violence against women is a very noble effort. However, I don’t understand what this misguided festival does to alleviate the problem. If anything, a monologue about a vagina is slighting to women.

Do you think proud women like Susan B. Anthony and Mary Wollstonecraft would have participated in such debauchery? Of course not! If these women had known their righteous quest for equal rights would one day degenerate into pin the clitoris on the vagina games, they may very well have relinquished their right to vote.

So I have a message for all of Cornell’s feminists out there. Stop talking about your vaginas! Not only is it disgusting and vulgar, but if you keep this up men are going to start to see you as nothing more than that—a bunch of vaginas.

Nick Kavanagh is a senior in the College of Arts and Sciences. He can be reached at nsk23@cornell.edu.

Great article Nick, the only problems I have with your article is that those "feminists" are already seen as nothing else but "vaginas" or even better "manginas". It is not for the future it is the PRESENT already, it has strated! And it is not only men whom are disgusted by their behavior. Some women are also disgusted by it. Those bunch of vaginas deserve no respect whatsoever! Good job man, keep doing what you're doing, the world needs to know how debauched those vaginas -manginas are and the world needs people like you!

Another thing that actually disagree with is your assumption that men are "morally depraved". Men are NOT morally depraved, that is another assumption that feminists would want to make you believe. It is simply their excuse to act as depraved savages. Same with their violence against women, reality is not as bad as what they would make you believe.

Overall though, you're on right track, keep the good work.

Speak about hatred and femiNAZISM

WOW, I am sooo amazed at the stupidity and hatred propagated by femiskunks . They accuse men fro being misogynists, but holly shit, some bitches are fuckin crazy!!!! They are a bunch of misandrists . Oh my... she should be arrested, jailed for life. No wonder we love to call femiNAZISTS , becasue that what they are!
Gee we should stone them to death. Muslims would probably appreciate the favor. Mind you, i disagree with most of what Islam preaches, but geeee some women should definitively be kept quite. This comment came from here, comment posted by our so not wonderful so not friendly bittingbeaver. Hey beaver, by the way we should sue your smelly ass for using the Canadian emblem without our permission for such a nasty endeavour!

I hate you because you hate us, I hate you because you are a sexist pig and you know what? I don't feel an ounce of fucking shame for hating a person as nasty, sexist and misogynist as you are.

hey you're the sexist bitch, you're the one who hates men.

*shrug* quite frankly I don't need you, nor do I need people like you in my life. I'm tired of telling jerk offs like you that I don't hate you. I DO hate you, I hate what you represent and I hate the lies you spread.

WOWWWWWWW, we do not want you to keep destroying the planet either with your nonsense, yeah yeah, that's what you're doing, you're wasting our resources.

Get over it. You don't want more radical feminists? Then fight sexism. Because every single time some asshat like you comes along with your MRA tag lines you make another one of me.

WOOWWWW, the sexism there is to fight, is yours femskunk.

You don't like me? You don't like what we stand for? Then fucking stop it. Make your brothers, uncles, fathers and friends stop raping and beating us. But don't blame me for hating you when you haven't done shit to show me that you're loveable.

Excuse me? yeah not my fault if you can't find a decent guy, that is up to you. Oh by the way, it is feminazism who stopped you from getting the help people like you need. You know, violence goes two ways. HAve you heard of addiction? Yes addiction to violence. Women like you are addicted to violence, that is why they always go for the bad guys. The reason i am saying feminazism is actually not for your best interest is because the threatened to kill Erin Pizzey, the woman who started the shelter movement... So now suffer bitch.
Most men are decent, you are the one who has no idea on how to find them and stick with them. SO you know what? do not make other people responsible for your fuckin behaviour and fallouts.

You want to bait women and try to make us fall on the ground to prove our devotion to the males of the species? Not this woman. There are men that I hate, there are many men that I despise and there are probably many more that I don't care for.

Boohoo, boohoo, poor victimized girl, what a pity hein?

Furthermore, why do you think that any woman, any PERSON owes you the privilege of LIKING you when you sit on your ass while your brothers and friends abuse us and hurt us. You want undying loyalty? Well get off your lazy ass and help us, attacking feminists won't make fewer feminists. Attacking men who hurt women WILL make fewer feminists.

All in your head sweetheart, you're the one who keeps these guys from helping you with your nasty attitude. You attract more flies with honey than with vinegar sweetie, you don't even attract my own sympathy, and I am a woman.
And all men I know, are loveable as you say.

Piss off asshat. Go troll under another bridge.

Funny how your type of bitches accuse MRA to troll on your blegs, but how about your fuckin kind trolling around ours??

Go get some mental help bitch.