(image source: Queen Mary)
The Department of Law, Queen Mary, University of London, organizes a conference on the "Neglected Dialogue" between Legal Theory and Legal History (12-13 April 2013). The call for papers and keynote speakers can be found on the Department's website (link).
Excerpt:
Apart from some notable exceptions, much of contemporary legal theory is
uninformed by history, including legal history. This is deeply
regrettable, for legal theories may be vastly improved by being
informed, and perhaps more importantly, challenged by historical
contexts. Theories of law, one might say, are better if they are forged
at the coal-face of historical research. Similarly, one could argue that
legal histories are better when they draw on, and themselves contribute
to, the conceptual resources of legal theory.
Somewhat more
radically, if one agrees law does not have a nature, but a culture, then
one must account for how the culture of law changes, and has changed,
over time. This, by necessity, demands a historically-informed
methodology. Similarly, the problem of change is an unavoidable one in
legal theory, whether that be change in legal regimes or changes in
certain areas of the law – here, again, the resources of history,
including the philosophy of history, are invaluable. Putting things a
little more colourfully, one could say that legal ideas cannot but be
understood historically.
Further, legal theory has, of course,
its own history: legal theories are not disconnected islands, but rather
interventions in a long series of dialogues and polylogues amongst
theorists. As many have observed, and described, legal theory’s history
needs to be informed not only by such dialogues and polylogues amongst
theorists, but also by awareness of the theorist’s immersion in
political, economic and other conditions of his or her time and place –
there, once more, a serious engagement with history is important.
This
conference - the annual conference of the UK Branch of the IVR - is
designed to bring together legal theorists and legal historians
(including historians of legal theory and political thought) in an
attempt to facilitate and encourage dialogue between the two
disciplines.
(source: Legal History Blog)
0 comments:
Post a Comment